Publication Type
PhD Dissertation
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
6-2025
Abstract
Our study finds that 43.14% of global green mergers & acquisitions (GMAs) from 2001 to 2020 may be susceptible to Green Embellishment—the gap between corporate environmental representations and actual performance, regardless of intent. Using a multi-criteria theoretical framework, we show that financial constraints strongly drive Green Embellishment in GMAs, with regulatory stringency and national culture moderating this effect. GMAs in weak regulatory environments are especially vulnerable, particularly under high stakeholder pressure. We further provide empirical evidence that financially constrained GMAs with lower green profiles and those in “browner” industries exhibit a higher propensity for Green Embellishment. Even in stringent regulatory settings, financially constrained GMAs still display moderate embellishment, suggesting that greater regulatory focus on actual performance outcomes is needed. Corporate boards and CEOs play a crucial role in ensuring sustainability is embedded into core business processes, in order that it leads to genuine performance.
Keywords
Sustainability, Green Embellishment, Greenwashing, Green Acquisition, Green Mergers and Acquisitions, GMA, Green Performance, Declared Sustainability Actions, Declared Actions, Substantive Sustainability Actions, Substantive Actions, Environmental Sustainability, Sustainability Governance
Degree Awarded
PhD in Business (General Management)
Discipline
Environmental Policy
Supervisor(s)
LIANG, Hao; GENG, Xuesong
First Page
1
Last Page
148
Publisher
Singapore Management University
City or Country
Singapore
Citation
SRINIVASAN, Sri V.
How “green” are green acquisitions really?. (2025). 1-148.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/674
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.