Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

8-2023

Abstract

Amidst the trends and advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, the dataset’s key role in creating AI harms is a constant. Yet the literature’s attention is typically focussed on the machinelearning’s role, from which the dataset’s role is examined usually in terms of its potential for bias. Datasets also contribute to AI hallucinations. Again, the literature focuses on the composite roles of datasets and AI models in hallucinations, in isolation from a dataset’s contributory role in creating bias. Therefore, the overlapping and distinctive roles of datasets, as a dual contributor, are understudied in the literature. Through the legal concept of a duty of care, in the context of AI applications in financial services, this paper surveys the overlapping and distinctive roles of datasets. This paper’s focus matters for three reasons. First, it is important to identify and determine which parties, now part of a growing ecosystem of stakeholders, are legally liable for selecting and creating the dataset. Second, the tort of negligence is medium-agnostic and can adapt to governing AI harms, which will influence ongoing legislative efforts that are medium-based. And third, this paper provides a frame of reference to start a broader conversation, beyond Singapore, about how datasets will become more prominent in an AI zeitgeist, and that the common law can play a stabilising effect on the policy makers’ impetus to regulate through medium-based legislations.

Keywords

AI hallucinations, Dataset bias, Dataset, Negligence, Duty of Care

Discipline

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics | Computer Law | Science and Technology Law

Research Areas

Integrative Research Areas

Publication

Journal of Digital Assets

Volume

19

Issue

2

First Page

68

Last Page

82

ISSN

2951-5181

Identifier

10.23164/journal.230808.000006

Publisher

Korea Fintech Society

Copyright Owner and License

Author-CC-BY

Share

COinS