Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

9-2009

Abstract

We provide a comparative perspective on the contributions of the special issue with regard to their applied methods and findings. In addition, we discuss problems that arise when using ‘wrong’ or at least ‘incorrect’ versions of election manifestos by presenting replications of estimated policy positions of German parties. We show that the latter can result in biased estimates that may affect the outcome of theoretical models. On the basis of those findings, we present the idea of the open access archive polidoc.net to build up a common database for political texts.

Discipline

Models and Methods | Political Science

Research Areas

Political Science

Publication

German Politics

Volume

18

Issue

3

First Page

441

Last Page

454

ISSN

0964-4008

Identifier

10.1080/09644000903055856

Publisher

Taylor and Francis Group

Copyright Owner and License

Publisher

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000903055856

Share

COinS