Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
3-2007
Abstract
In this paper we compare estimates of the left-right positions of political parties derived from an expert survey recently completed by the authors with those derived by the Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) from the content analysis of party manifestos. Having briefly described the expert survey, we first explore the substantive policy content of left and right in the expert survey estimates. We then compare the expert survey to the CMP method on methodological grounds. Third, we directly compare the expert survey results to the CMP results for the most recent time period available, revealing some agreement but also numerous inconsistencies in both cross-national and within-country party placements. We conclude by investigating the CMP scores in more detail, focusing on the series of British left-right placements and the components of these scores.
Keywords
Left-right, Political parties, Expert survey, Comparative manifestos project, Content analysis
Discipline
Models and Methods | Political Science
Research Areas
Political Science
Publication
Electoral Studies
Volume
26
Issue
1
First Page
90
Last Page
107
ISSN
0261-3794
Identifier
10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
BENOIT, Kenneth, & LAVER, Michael.(2007). Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 90-107.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/3986
Copyright Owner and License
Publisher
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008