Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

7-2018

Abstract

Systematic reviews of research methods in the public administration field have assessed the progress of research practice and offered relevant recommendations to further develop research quality. But most recent reviews examine quantitative studies, and the few assessments of qualitative scholarship tend to focus on specific dimensions. This article calls attention to the overall practice of qualitative research in the field of public administration. The authors analyzed 129 qualitative studies published during a five-year period (2010–14) in the six top public administration journals, combining bibliometric and qualitative analyses. Three findings are drawn from the analysis. First, qualitative work represents a very small percentage of the journal articles published in the field. Second, qualitative research practice uses a small range of methodologies, mainly case studies. Finally, there is inconsistency in reporting methodological decisions. The article discusses the implications of these findings and offers recommendations to ensure methodological rigor while considering the integrity of the logic of inquiry and reporting standards of qualitative research practice.

Keywords

Public administration, qualitative research, research methods, research quality

Discipline

Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration

Research Areas

Political Science

Publication

Public Administration Review

Volume

78

Issue

4

First Page

593

Last Page

605

ISSN

0033-3352

Identifier

10.1111/puar.12837

Publisher

Wiley

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12837

Download

Share

COinS