Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
5-2017
Abstract
Why does a state build institutional capacity in certain sectors rather than others? Despite having gained leverage explaining the emergence of institutions in the developmental states of East Asia, we have comparatively weak accounts for sub‐national variation in institutional strength, a much more common phenomenon. Investigating the surprising achievements of the Philippines’ National Irrigation Administration, this article advances a theory of sectoral success in the face of a generally poor developmental record. The author demonstrates that executives will only construct institutional capacity when facing strong political pressure combined with resource scarcity. Such vulnerability permits politicians to exercise discretion in choosing which policies to pursue, allowing them to avoid upsetting their coalitions. Once a politician achieves some degree of policy success, he or she is then able to avoid engaging in similar reforms in other fields. Thus we see pockets of institutional capacity in states that otherwise struggle with developmental tasks.
Keywords
Development, Institutional Capacity, Policy Reform, Philippines, Irrigation
Discipline
Asian Studies | Political Science | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Research Areas
Political Science
Publication
Development and Change
Volume
48
Issue
3
First Page
567
Last Page
589
ISSN
1467-7660
Identifier
10.1111/dech.12300
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Citation
RICKS, Jacob I..(2017). Sector-specific development and policy vulnerability in the Philippines. Development and Change, 48(3), 567-589.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2142
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12300
Included in
Asian Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons