Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
10-2005
Abstract
This article reviews work on 'cultural economy', particularly from within geography, and from other disciplines, where there are links to overtly geographical debates. We seek to clarify different interpretations of the term and to steer a course through this multivalency to suggest productive new research agendas. We review and critique work on cultural economy that represents a relatively straightforward economic geography, based on empirical observation while theoretically informed and driven by debates about Fordism and post-Fordism, agglomeration and cluster theory. Some of these ideas about cultural economy have proven attractive to policy-makers and we map a normative script of cultural economy, with its prescriptive recommendations for economic development, which we then critique. Turning from this normative cultural economy, we move to a more theoretical discussion which reinterprets the cultural economy in light of debates on the culturization of 'the economic' in research praxis. We conclude that better acknowledgement is needed of the contradictory uses of 'cultural economy', but point nevertheless to the value of this multivalency as long as we reflect on the multiple contradictions and interpretations. With many current absences in work on cultural economy, we suggest various agendas waiting to be addressed.
Keywords
cluster theory, creative industries, cultural economy, cultural policy, urban regeneration
Discipline
Human Geography | Sociology of Culture | Urban Studies
Research Areas
Humanities
Publication
Progress in Human Geography
Volume
29
Issue
5
First Page
541
Last Page
561
ISSN
0309-1325
Identifier
10.1191/0309132505ph567oa
Publisher
SAGE
Citation
Gibson, Chris, & Kong, Lily.(2005). Cultural Economy: A Critical Review. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 541-561.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1704
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph567oa