Sexual Conflict in Mating Strategies

Publication Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

1-2012

Abstract

Men and women often come into conflict over issues of mating and sex. From an evolutionary perspective, we review the literature on attitudes toward casual sex, sexual intent, sexual harassment, rape, and deception of intent and mate value. Stemming from a key difference in parental investment (Trivers, 1972), men tend to be relatively eager for casual sexual partners, whereas women tend to be more cautious, requiring their sexual partners to be of higher quality or committed for a longer duration. This key difference, in turn, sets the stage whereby men and women negotiate their conflicted interests and enact their differing preferred mating strategies. As each side advances and protects its own reproductive interests, the other side’s strategy is necessarily interfered with and conflict ensues, sometimes with severe outcomes.

Keywords

sexual conflict, mating strategies, deception, sexual intent, sexual harassment, rape, mate value, sex differences, evolutionary psychology

Discipline

Family, Life Course, and Society | Gender and Sexuality

Research Areas

Psychology

Publication

Oxford Handbook of Sexual Conflict in Humans

Editor

Todd K. Shackelford, and Aaron T. Goetz,

First Page

49

Last Page

71

ISBN

9780195396706

Identifier

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396706.013.0004

Publisher

Oxford University Press

City or Country

New York

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396706.013.0004

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS