Publication Type
Working Paper
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
3-2006
Abstract
Arguably the fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. This should be especially useful in work systems where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult, such as teamwork systems. We analyze the relationship between screening and monitoring in the context of a principal-agent model and test the theoretical results using a national sample of U.S. establishments, which includes information on employee selection. We find that employers screen applicants more intensively for work ethic where they make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher productivity and higher wages and benefits, as predicted by the theory: The synergies between reduced monitoring costs and high performance work systems enable the firm to pay higher wages to attract and retain such workers. Screening for other attributes, such as cognitive ability, does not produce these results.
Discipline
Labor Economics
Research Areas
Applied Microeconomics
Volume
11-2006
First Page
1
Last Page
34
Publisher
SMU Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series, No. 11-2006
City or Country
Singapore
Citation
HUANG, Fali and CAPPELLI, Peter.
Employee Screening: Theory and Evidence. (2006). 11-2006, 1-34.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/895
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Comments
Under review as NBER Working Paper No. 12071