Alternative Title

Does Competition within the Military Reduce Expropriation?

Publication Type

Working Paper

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

5-2015

Abstract

How can agents in the military, who control the means of coercion, commit not to expropriate from producers? In this paper we propose competition within the military as one of the mechanisms that can deter predation and consequently create commitment. In our model, even if agents within the military could expropriate all output costlessly, it is attractive to protect producers from predating military units. This is because there is a marginal defensive advantage and consequently defense is an effective way to potentially eliminate other military units, reducing competition and leading to higher future payoffs. Our model predicts that greater internal competition within the military lowers the risk of expropriation and that this effect is strongest for countries with low institutional and economic development. Testing this prediction empirically, we find a robust negative relationship between competition within the military and expropriation risk. In line with our model this effect is strongest for countries at lower stages of institutional and economic development, and it weakens as the latter improve. These results indicate that there may be a short-run component to property rights institutions that varies with the degree of competition among agents who control the means of coercion.

Keywords

property rights, military power, checks and balances, institutions

Discipline

Behavioral Economics

Research Areas

Applied Microeconomics

First Page

1

Last Page

45

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Download

Share

COinS