Incentive Mechanisms, Fairness and Participation in Group-Buying Auctions
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2010
Abstract
The main idea of an online group-buying auction is to recruit enough people to generate a sufficient volume of orders to create the basis for a lower transaction price. Typically, the larger the number of orders, the more consumers will wish to participate. This is because the final auction price is likely to be lower than it would be otherwise. This positive feedback is a demand externalities phenomenon. Nevertheless, there also is a phenomenon of inertia that often occurs at the beginning of online group-buying auctions. Due to the small number of orders that occur in the beginning of an online group-buying auction, many potential participants are inclined to wait until the auction price for the sale item falls to an acceptable level. This only comes through the participation of more people in the auction. As a result, consumers will tend to wait for one another to join the auction. Thus, the startup inertia must be overcome before the number of orders will increase. We explore three incentive mechanisms to address this problem: sequence-based, time-based and quantity-based incentives. We conducted a series of experiments using an online group-buying auction experimental test bed deployed on the Internet to develop deeper insights into how these incentives work in the context of bakery cookie sales. Using theory to represent a variety of decision-making perspectives that can be applied in the online group-buying auction context, we explore whether the different incentive mechanisms cause consumers to perceive a lack of price fairness and procedural fairness in an auction’s operations. Our results suggest that consumers view participation discounts as creating the basis for perceptions of greater price fairness in online group-buying auctions. Compared with other incentive mechanisms, a sequence-based incentive mechanism gives consumers a sense of less procedural fairness. Finally, perceptions of fairness tend to have a positive association with price satisfaction and purchase intention.
Keywords
Discount effects, Experimental methods, Fairness, Group-buying auction, Incentives, Mechanism design, Online auctions, Price fairness, Price satisfaction, Procedural fairness, Purchase intention
Discipline
Computer Sciences | E-Commerce
Research Areas
Information Systems and Management
Publication
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Volume
9
Issue
3
First Page
249
Last Page
262
ISSN
1567-4223
Identifier
10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.009
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
KAUFFMAN, Robert J.; LAI, Hsiangchu; and HO, Chao-Tsung.
Incentive Mechanisms, Fairness and Participation in Group-Buying Auctions. (2010). Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 9, (3), 249-262.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2122
Additional URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.009