Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
9-2009
Abstract
This article analyzes the relationship between the risk-adjusted performance of hedge funds and their proximity to investments using data on Asia-focused hedge funds. I find, relative to an augmented Fung and Hsieh (2004) factor model, that hedge funds with a physical presence (head or research office) in their investment region outperform other hedge funds by 3.72% per year. The local information advantage is pervasive across all major geographical regions, but is strongest for emerging market funds and funds holding illiquid securities. These results are robust to adjustments for fund fees, serial correlation, backfill bias, and incubation bias. I show also that distant funds, especially those based in the United States and the United Kingdom, are able to raise more capital, charge higher fees, and set longer redemption periods, despite their underperformance relative to nearby funds. It appears that distant funds trade investment performance for better access to capital.
Discipline
Business | Finance and Financial Management | Portfolio and Security Analysis
Research Areas
Finance
Publication
Review of Financial Studies
Volume
22
Issue
9
First Page
3531
Last Page
3561
ISSN
0893-9454
Identifier
10.1093/rfs/hhp007
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Citation
TEO, Melvyn.
The Geography of Hedge Funds. (2009). Review of Financial Studies. 22, (9), 3531-3561.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/985
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp007