Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
8-2002
Abstract
In this study, the authors examined the findings and implications of the research on trust in leadership that has been conducted during the past 4 decades. First, the study provides estimates of the primary relationships between trust in leadership and key outcomes, antecedents, and correlates (k = 106). Second, the study explores how specifying the construct with alternative leadership referents (direct leaders vs. organizational leadership) and definitions (types of trust) results in systematically different relationships between trust in leadership and outcomes and antecedents. Direct leaders (e.g., supervisors) appear to be a particularly important referent of trust. Last, a theoretical framework is offered to provide parsimony to the expansive literature and to clarify the different perspectives on the construct of trust in leadership and its operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Keywords
trust, leadership, direct leaders vs organizational leadership
Discipline
Business | Leadership Studies | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Journal of Applied Psychology
Volume
87
Issue
4
First Page
611
Last Page
628
ISSN
0021-9010
Identifier
10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Citation
DIRKS, Kurt T. and FERRIN, Donald L..
Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. (2002). Journal of Applied Psychology. 87, (4), 611-628.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/675
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611