Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

submittedVersion

Publication Date

8-2020

Abstract

Despite the common belief that situation descriptions in SJTs are central to the measurement of targeted constructs, recent studies demonstrated that omitting situation descriptions had only minor effects on SJT performance and validity. However, these results might be due to the fact that traditional SJTs often fail to assess well-defined constructs. So, we aimed to examine the relationships between construct-driven SJT scores with and without situations and self- and peer-rated personality dimensions (N = 158). Results revealed almost no difference in construct-related validity between both versions. The conscientiousness facet emerged as the only exception, for which the SJT scores without situation descriptions yielded a significantly higher convergent correlation.

Keywords

Situational judgment test, Construct-related validity, Contextualization, Personality assessment

Discipline

Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory

Research Areas

Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources

Publication

Journal of Research in Personality

Volume

87

First Page

1

Last Page

5

ISSN

0092-6566

Identifier

10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103963

Publisher

Elsevier: 24 months

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Comments

All data and code are available on the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/py6cm/

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103963

Share

COinS