Publication Type
Conference Proceeding Article
Publication Date
1-2010
Abstract
We examine the effects of individual, team, and institutional capabilities on the governance of technology contracts. Star scientific teams may work on higher quality projects which may be of high or low risk, depending on the maturity of the technology. Arguments that assumed that both capabilities and risk are codetermined, and seldom diverge in their effects on incentive preferences, may be tenuous in these cases. We test our predictions using a two-stage model in a sample of 1,474 inventions that were licensed through performance or upfront contracts. We find that when individuals and teams have strong capabilities, they prefer performance contracts, even if the underlying technology was more mature (or of lower risk). These results explain conditions when inventors facing the same technology risk elect to organize their transactions differently. The implications for theories of risk, capabilities, and innovation are discussed.
Discipline
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations | Higher Education | Strategic Management Policy | Technology and Innovation
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference
Volume
30
First Page
5-1
Last Page
5-1
ISBN
9780910897327
Publisher
Babson College
City or Country
Babson Park, MA
Citation
KOTHA, Reddi and GEORGE, Gerard.
Academic entrepreneurs: The role of star scientists in commercialization of radical science. (2010). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference. 30, 5-1-5-1.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5348
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
External URL
https://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol30/iss18/5
Included in
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Commons, Higher Education Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons