"An institutional perspective and the role of the state for Chinese OFD" by Bing REN, Hao LIANG et al.
 

Publication Type

Book Chapter

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

1-2012

Abstract

Napoleon called China a ‘sleeping dragon’, but recent economic developments as China enters the twenty-first century show that the dragon is awakening. China has maintained strong economic growth since 1979 and sustained a GDP increase of more than 9 percent over the years. The total volume of economic output increased from 2.8 percent in 1970 to 7.23 percent in 2008, ranking China as the third largest economy in the world (United Nation Statistics Division Statistical Databases). China launched its ‘Go Global’ policy in 1999 to encourage highperforming Chinese firms to invest abroad and upgrade their global competence. Since then, outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) flows reached US$55.91 billion in 2008, equal to the FDI inflow in 2003. The annual growth rate of OFDI averaged 65.7 percent from 2002 to 2008 (Ministry of Commerce of China). OFDI flows via mergers and acquisitions (M&As) accounted for 54 percent of the total volume of OFDI (US$30.2 billion) and an annual increase rate of 379 percent (from 2002 to 2008). China’s OFDI volume reached USD52.15 billion in 2009 (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan), equaling 3 percent of global OFDI (World Investment Report, 2009). How are Chinese firms able to ‘go global’ so quickly – given their relatively weaker competencies in technological know-how and management skills and weak ability in integrating global value chains (Deng, 2004; Sun, Peng, Ren, & Yan, 2010)? According to multinational enterprise (MNE) theories based on Western firms, such as the Ownership-Location-Internalization (OLI) paradigm (Dunning, 1980, 1993), it is difficult to explain why this aggressive international expansion by Chinese firms works so well despite weaker firm-specific ownership advantage. We also note that China’s international expansion is largely undertaken by state-owned enterprises (SOEs). State policies have played a key role in pushing Chinese firms to go abroad, which poses a challenge to existing MNE and FDI theories (Dunning & Lundan, 2008; Sun et al., 2010).

Discipline

Asian Studies | Finance | Finance and Financial Management | Growth and Development

Research Areas

Finance

Publication

Chinese International Investments

Editor

Ilan Alon, Marc Fetscherin, & Philippe Gugler

First Page

11

Last Page

37

ISBN

9780230280960

Identifier

10.1057/9780230361577_2

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan

City or Country

Houndmills

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230361577_2

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 9
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 43
  • Captures
    • Readers: 13
see details

Share

COinS