Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
2-2015
Abstract
In this study, we identify the effects of reputation and status by determining how they are differently valued by organizations that are concurrently pursuing different goals. Building on research on intangible assets and on aspiration levels, we develop a framework to explain organizations’ valuation of resource providers. We expect organizations to value resource providers who possess a specific type of intangible asset higher as their performance, relative to aspirations, decreases on the outcome more closely tied to that particular asset. We also expect to observe this sensitivity primarily when the organization has a low level of the intangible asset in question. Based on this framework, we derive specific hypotheses using the differential relationships between reputation and status, as two types of intangible assets, and product quality and revenues, as two types of goals. We find support for our hypotheses using a longitudinal dataset on National Basketball Association teams and players.
Keywords
Aspiration levels, intangible assets, regression analysis, reputation, status
Discipline
Organizational Behavior and Theory | Strategic Management Policy
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Strategic Organization
Volume
13
Issue
1
First Page
6
Last Page
31
ISSN
1476-1270
Identifier
10.1177/1476127014561019
Publisher
SAGE
Citation
ERTUG, Gokhan and CASTELLUCCI, Fabrizio.
Who shall get more? How intangible resources and aspiration levels affect the valuation of resource providers. (2015). Strategic Organization. 13, (1), 6-31.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4397
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014561019