Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
9-2014
Abstract
To enhance employee performance, many organizations are increasingly using electronic performance monitoring (EPM). The relationship between the frequency of EPM use and employee performance is examined in 2 field studies. In Study 1, which uses a unique longitudinal data set, results reveal that shorter time lags between 2 consecutive employee performance assessments are related to better task performance as indicated by call quality metrics. A second field study using matched supervisor–employee and EPM system data is conducted in 2 call centers to extend these results and to focus more directly on the supervisors’ use of EPM and its relationship with additional performance criteria: counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs) and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs). Results indicate that more frequent supervisory use of EPM is associated with better task performance and OCB. However, supervisory use of EPM was not significantly related to CWB.
Keywords
electronic performance monitoring, employee performance, task performance, work behavior
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Personnel Psychology
Volume
67
Issue
3
First Page
605
Last Page
635
ISSN
1744-6570
Identifier
10.1111/peps.12046
Publisher
Wiley
Citation
BHAVE, Devasheesh P.
The Invisible Eye? Electronic Performance Monitoring and Employee Job Performance. (2014). Personnel Psychology. 67, (3), 605-635.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3642
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12046
Included in
Human Resources Management Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons