Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
4-2013
Abstract
We examine why commercialization of interdisciplinary research, especially from distant scientific domains, is different from commercialization of inventions from specialized or proximate domains. We argue that anticipated coordination costs arising from the need to transfer technology to licensee firms and from the need for an inventor team's members to work together to further develop a technology significantly impact commercialization outcomes. We use a sample of 3,776 university invention disclosures to test whether variation in the types of experience of the scientists on a team influences the likelihood that an invention will be licensed. We proffer evidence to support our hypotheses that anticipated coordination costs influence whether an invention is licensed and that specific forms of team experience attenuate such coordination costs. The implications of these findings for theories of coordination, innovation, and entrepreneurship are discussed.
Keywords
Technology and Innovation, Management, Management of technology, Design/Structure, Organization and Management Theory
Discipline
Higher Education | Strategic Management Policy | Technology and Innovation
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Academy of Management Journal
Volume
56
Issue
2
First Page
498
Last Page
524
ISSN
0001-4273
Identifier
10.5465/amj.2010.0948
Publisher
Academy of Management
Citation
KOTHA, Reddi; GEORGE, Gerard; and SRIKANTH, Kannan.
Bridging the mutual knowledge gap: Coordination and the commercialization of university science. (2013). Academy of Management Journal. 56, (2), 498-524.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3624
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0948
Included in
Higher Education Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons
Comments
Best paper award at BPS Division at AOM 2010