Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
10-2014
Abstract
Trust has long been recognized by scholars and practitioners alike as an important factor for negotiation success. However, there has been little effort to date to empirically review or theoretically synthesize the research on trust in the context of negotiations. We present a social exchange framework that describes the processes through which trust influences negotiation behaviors and outcomes. We identified three critical contingencies that modified the effects of trust on negotiation behaviors and outcomes. A meta-analysis on a sample of 38 independent studies provided considerable support for the model and also confirmed the importance of the three contingencies for understanding the effects of trust. The framework and accompanying empirical evidence provide a needed theoretical and empirical integration of the trust and negotiation literatures. Based on the theory and meta-analytical findings, we identified critical gaps and limitations in existing research and proposed a research agenda to address key theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues identified by our framework and review.
Keywords
meta-analytic path analysis, trust, negotiation, distributive behaviors, integrative behaviors, negotiation outcomes, outcome satisfaction, negotiation process
Discipline
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Academy of Management Journal
Volume
57
Issue
5
First Page
1235
Last Page
1255
ISSN
0001-4273
Identifier
10.5465/amj.2012.0461
Publisher
Academy of Management
Citation
KONG, Dejun Tony; DIRKS, Kurt T.; and FERRIN, Donald L..
Interpersonal Trust Within Negotiations: Meta-Analytic Evidence, Critical Contingencies, and Directions for Future Research. (2014). Academy of Management Journal. 57, (5), 1235-1255.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3530
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0461