Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
7-2011
Abstract
This research examines the moderating role of regret aversion in reason-based choice. Earlier research has shown that regret aversion and reason-based choice effects are linked through a common emphasis on decision justification, and that a simple manipulation of regret salience can eliminate the decoy effect, a well-known reason-based choice effect. We show here that the effect of regret salience varies in theory-relevant ways from one reason-based choice effect to another. For effects such as the select/reject and decoy effect, both of which were independently judged to be unreasonable bases for deciding, regret salience eliminated the effect. For the most-important attribute effect that is judged to be normatively acceptable, however, regret salience amplified the effect. Anticipated self-blame regret and perceived decision justifiability consistently predicted preferences and thus offer a parsimonious account of both attenuation and amplification of these reason-based choice effects.
Keywords
Decision justification, Reason-based choice, Regret, Regret aversion, Decoy effect, Accept/reject effect, Most important attribute effect
Discipline
Organizational Behavior and Theory | Sales and Merchandising
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Theory and Decision
Volume
73
Issue
1
First Page
35
Last Page
51
ISSN
0040-5833
Identifier
10.1007/s11238-011-9269-0
Publisher
Springer
Citation
CONNOLLY, Terry and REB, Jochen.
Regret Aversion in Reason-based Choice. (2011). Theory and Decision. 73, (1), 35-51.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3155
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9269-0