Measurement Errors in Probability Judgments
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
9-1996
Abstract
This paper investigates the psychometric properties of three measures of subjective uncertainty-a zero-to-hundred subjective probability scale and two seven point rating scales. Individual level analysis applied to data obtained from two separate studies suggests that the scales produce fairly similar results: The inter-response mode correlations were high, and individual plots comparing various methods were quite similar. Covariance structure models based on multitrait-multimethod matrices are utilized to assess the reliability and method variance of the scales. The cumulative evidence suggests that rating scales are consistently just as reliable as the subjective probability scale. The probability scale contained significant method error. In fact, the two rating scales were found to have lower systematic method variance and lower random error variance than the subjective probability scale. The paper concludes with a discussion regarding possible explanations of these results and directions for future research.
Keywords
subjective uncertainty, subjective probability, rating scales, covariance structure models, reliability, method variance
Discipline
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Research Areas
Marketing
Publication
Management Science
Volume
42
Issue
9
First Page
1308
Last Page
1325
ISSN
0025-1909
Identifier
10.1287/mnsc.42.9.1308
Publisher
INFORMS
Citation
OFIR, Chezy and REDDY, Srinivas K..
Measurement Errors in Probability Judgments. (1996). Management Science. 42, (9), 1308-1325.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2986
Additional URL
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634439