How Do Advertising Creative Directors Perceive Research?
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
6-2010
Abstract
Past research indicates that advertising practitioners have systematically ignored research for a number of reasons. This study is perhaps the first to understand how creative directors of international advertising agencies perceive the topic. A total of 17 creative directors based in Singapore were interviewed. Their responses focus on the shortcomings of research instead of its benefits. More specifically, they criticise the misguided use of focus groups to understand consumers; the fact that published research often comes too slow and too late; the non-contextual fashion in which most advertising research is conducted; the unrealistic nature of pre-campaign research; and the use of research as a rhetorical tool. In addition, they assert that the creative nature of developing advertisements is fundamentally at odds with the methodical, 'scientific' nature of research, and doubt that the two can be fully reconciled. Nonetheless, several of them acknowledge that research that provides fresh consumer insights and product 'truths' can help in the ad development process. Several suggestions for making research relevant and attractive to agency creative directors are offered in the discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Discipline
Advertising and Promotion Management
Research Areas
Marketing
Publication
International Journal of Advertising
Volume
25
Issue
3
First Page
261
Last Page
380
ISSN
0265-0487
Citation
Chong, Mark.
How Do Advertising Creative Directors Perceive Research?. (2010). International Journal of Advertising. 25, (3), 261-380.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2478