Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
9-1999
Abstract
This paper explores whether excess holding period returns on long vis-a-vis short-term securities behave in a manner that is consistent with (1) market efficiency, (2) the time-varying-term-premium variant of the expectations hypothesis, and (3) theories of the term premium that view it as a reward for risk bearing. Both traditional and modern theories of the term premium imply that it should evolve fairly slowly over time as attitudes toward risk and/or perceived covariances with wealth or consumption change. This implies that this period's term premium should have some predictive ability for next period's. However, we find that this quarter's ex-post term premium has zero predictive ability. For monthly rates and returns, the evidence is less clear cut, but again the implied term premia do not behave in a manner consistent with existing theories.
Keywords
Securities, risk
Discipline
Business | Corporate Finance | Finance and Financial Management
Research Areas
Finance
Publication
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume
13
Issue
2
First Page
137
Last Page
151
ISSN
0924-865X
Identifier
10.1023/A:1008343809125
Publisher
Kluwer
Citation
Ederington, Louis H. and GOH, Jeremy C..
Is the Term Premium a Risk Premium?. (1999). Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 13, (2), 137-151.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2202
Copyright Owner and License
Publisher
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008343809125