Publication Type
Conference Proceeding Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
2001
Abstract
It is well established that reading alphabetic words is dominated by phonological (sound-based) processes, whereas phonological processes do not appear to dominate the processing of Chinese logographs, where visual processes are more pronounced (for reviews, see Tavassoli, in press; Zhou & Marslen-Wilson, 1999). Most previous demonstrations of these linguistic differences have relied on low-level processes that potentially do not involve short-term memory. For example, they have attempted to assess differences in the speed (measured in milliseconds) by which phonological and semantic information get activated in the brain. Our research adds to a growing stream of consumer behavior research that has shown these low-level processing differences to have profound implications for higher-order processes such as recall and attitude formation (Pan & Schmitt 1996; Schmitt, Pan & Tavassoli 1994; Tavassoli 1999, 2001). Specifically, we examine the interactive processing of words with sounds and images, and the flexibility bilingual and biscriptal consumers show in their processing styles (Tavassoli & Han, 2001; Tavassoli & Han, 2002).
Discipline
Business and Corporate Communications | Marketing
Research Areas
Marketing
Publication
Advances in Consumer Research
Volume
29
First Page
186
Last Page
187
ISSN
0098-9258
Publisher
Association for Consumer Research
City or Country
Provo, UT
Citation
Tavassoli, Nader T. and Han, Jin K..
On the Interaction of Alphabetic and Logographic Words with Sounds and Images. (2001). Advances in Consumer Research. 29, 186-187.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1960
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/8563/volumes/v29/NA-29
Comments
Advances in Consumer Research, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, Vol 28