This article examines whether focusing primarily on public schooling can lead to more rapid achievement of universal basic education (UBE) than relying on a mixture of public and private schooling. Through a structured, focused comparison, we find China's greater emphasis on public schooling has contributed to higher enrollment, attendance, graduation rates, gender parity, and proportion of students entering higher education than India, the country with the world's largest private sector in primary and secondary education. This comparison suggests that greater emphasis on public schooling in developing countries may lead to more rapid UBE attainment than encouraging privatization.
India, China, Privatization, Universal basic education, Millennium development goals
Asian Studies | Education | Education Policy
International Journal of Educational Development
SMITH, William C. and JOSHI, Devin K..
Public vs. private schooling as a route to universal basic education: A comparison of China and India. (2016). International Journal of Educational Development. 46, 153-165. Research Collection School of Social Sciences.
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research_all/21
Copyright Owner and License
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.