This article investigates the relationship between the European Union's withdrawal of trade benefits for developing countries under the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) and its sanctions under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Our expectation is that GSP withdrawals and CFSP sanctions will not cohere. However, our research reveals that GSP suspension has been coherent with CFSP sanctions when the latter exist prior to the decision-making process on GSP sanctions and when the International Labour Organisation has set up a Commission of Inquiry condemning the country, as with Myanmar/Burma and Belarus. The presence of separate institutional frameworks explains the GSP suspension towards Sri Lanka in the absence of CFSP sanctions.
EU trade, sanctions, development, GSP, Myanmar/Burma, Belarus
Growth and Development
The trade-development nexus in the European Union: Differentiation, coherence and norms
Taylor and Francis Inc.
PORTELA, Clara, & ORBIE, Jan. (2016). Sanctions under the EU Generalised System of Preferences and foreign policy: Coherence by accident?. In The trade-development nexus in the European Union: Differentiation, coherence and norms (pp. 63-76). : Taylor and Francis Inc..
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2131
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.