Publication Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

4-2015

Abstract

We report the results of three high-powered replications of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) idea that writing about comfort food reduces feelings of loneliness amongst securely attached individuals after a belongingness threat. We conducted our studies amongst a large group of participants (Total N = 649) amongst American (MTurk), Dutch (Tilburg University; TiU), and Singaporean (Singapore Management University; SMU) samples. Participants first completed an attachment style scale, followed by writing two essays for manipulating a sense of belongingness and salience of comfort food, and then reporting their loneliness levels. We did not confirm the overall effect over all three countries. However, exploratory results provide the preliminary suggestion that (1) the comfort food explanation likely holds amongst the American samples (including Troisi and Gabriel's), but not amongst the TiU and SMU samples, and potentially that (2) the TiU and SMU participants self-regulate through warmer (vs. colder) temperature foods. Both of these should be regarded with great caution as these analyses were exploratory, and because the Ns for the different temperature foods were small. We suspect we have uncovered first cross-cultural differences in self-regulation through food, but further confirmatory work is required to understand the cultural significance of comfort food for self-regulation.

Keywords

replication, comfort food, loneliness, embodied cognition

Discipline

Psychology

Research Areas

Psychology

Publication

Frontiers in Psychology

Volume

6

First Page

1

Last Page

9

ISSN

1664-1078

Identifier

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00314

Embargo Period

7-10-2015

data sheet 1.pdf (224 kB)
Supplementary material

Additional URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00314

Comments

The supplementary file contains the questionnaires and scales, consent form, and methodology used.

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS