Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

Postprint

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

Although it is commonly believed that women are kinder and more cooperative than men, there is conflicting evidence for this assertion. Current theories of sex differences in social behavior suggest that it may be useful to examine in what situations men and women are likely to differ in cooperation. Here, we derive predictions from both sociocultural and evolutionary perspectives on context-specific sex differences in cooperation, and we conduct a unique meta-analytic study of 272 effect sizes—sampled across 50 years of research—on social dilemmas to examine several potential moderators. The overall average effect size is not statistically different from zero (d - 0.05), suggesting that men and women do not differ in their overall amounts of cooperation. However, the association between sex and cooperation is moderated by several key features of the social context: Male–male interactions are more cooperative than female–female interactions (d 0.16), yet women cooperate more than men in mixed-sex interactions (d - 0.22). In repeated interactions, men are more cooperative than women. Women were more cooperative than men in larger groups and in more recent studies, but these differences disappeared after statistically controlling for several study characteristics. We discuss these results in the context of both sociocultural and evolutionary theories of sex differences, stress the need for an integrated biosocial approach, and outline directions for future research.

Keywords

gender, sex differences, cooperation, social dilemmas, meta-analysis

Discipline

Social Psychology | Theory and Philosophy

Research Areas

Psychology

Publication

Psychological Bulletin

Volume

137

Issue

6

First Page

881

Last Page

909

ISSN

0033-2909

Identifier

10.1037/a0025354

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Additional URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025354

Share

COinS