Publication Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

7-2009

Abstract

The focus of Singapore's response to terrorism post 9/11 has been to reach out to the “moderate, mainstream” Muslims as a bulwark against societal implosion. This article examines the broad-based endeavor toward “religious moderation.” While coercive draconian legislation remain the mainstay against extremists and radicals, the mobilization of soft law, aspirational norms, and values are consciously woven into the state's endeavors to enhance society's resilience and cohesion. They also seek to regulate religious conduct at a time when the state wishes to entrench secularism as a cornerstone of the governance of a multi-racial, multireligious society. Rights and regulation are not antithetical to each other; they are integral to the entire process of managing sociopolitical risks that presents a real danger of an incivility spiral in which distrust, fear, and suspicion conspire toward societal breakdown.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Public Law and Legal Theory | Public Policy | Religion Law

Research Areas

Law, Society and Governance

Publication

Law and Policy

Volume

31

Issue

3

First Page

351

Last Page

379

ISSN

0265-8240

Identifier

10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00294.x

Publisher

Wiley

Copyright Owner and License

Author

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00294.x

Share

COinS