Choice of Law for Director's Equitable Duty of Care and Concurrence
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2005
Abstract
Base Metal v. Shamurin A. Introduction What law applies to a claim for damages for breach of a company director’s equitable duty of care? This question raises difficulties in the choice of law involving equitable doctrines and the borderlands in the choice of law categories for obligations and corporations. The question is compounded by the potential overlapping sources of a director’s duty of care in domestic law: statute, tort, contract, and equity. This gives rise to another difficulty: should the claimant be allowed to pick and choose from as many choice of law rules as there are such causes of action, even though the individual causes of action may be different domestic conceptualizations of a single duty arising from the facts?
Discipline
Commercial Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
Volume
2005
Issue
2
First Page
144
Last Page
152
ISSN
0306-2945
Publisher
Informa
Citation
YEO, Tiong Min.
Choice of Law for Director's Equitable Duty of Care and Concurrence. (2005). Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. 2005, (2), 144-152.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/757
Additional URL
http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130452