Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

submittedVersion

Publication Date

7-2024

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of common intention constructive trust claims in Singapore. The main reason is that families have acquired real estate using their collective earning power without explicitly considering the individual entitlement of each family member. When a dispute arises, the claim is often pleaded as a common intention constructive trust. The complication with applying the law on the common intention constructive trust is that this is an English doctrine developed to deal with a different social context i.e. the breakdown of the relationship between cohabiting couples. In Singapore, the common intention constructive trust applies primarily in a different situation namely in the breakdown of kinship between parents and offsprings or between siblings. These relationships are often difficult to unpack because they are imbued with informal familial and cultural norms. Doctrinal complexity is also presented since the common intention constructive trust is often pleaded together with other doctrines such as resulting trusts and gifts. This article proposes that it is time to take Occam’s razor to the often cited six-steps framework in Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun to a simplified three-stage analysis.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Estates and Trusts | Property Law and Real Estate

Research Areas

Private Law

Publication

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family

Volume

38

Issue

12

First Page

1

Last Page

21

ISSN

1360-9939

Identifier

10.1093/lawfam/ebae012

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Embargo Period

7-30-2024

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebae012

Download

Share

COinS