Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
4-2022
Abstract
In this article, the author compares two concepts that seek to explain why an assignee of a chose in action may be burdened by an arbitration agreement to which it is not privy. He posits that, of the “conditional benefits” concept and the “subject to equities” principle, the latter provides the better explanation.
Discipline
Contracts | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Corporate, Finance and Securities Law; Dispute Resolution
Publication
Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law
Volume
37
Issue
4
First Page
234
Last Page
238
ISSN
0269-2694
Citation
THAM, Chee Ho.
Burdening assignees with arbitration agreements via ‘conditional benefits’. (2022). Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law. 37, (4), 234-238.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4146
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.