The Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court’s ruling that the applicant had no locus standito challenge the compatibility of a loan made by the Government to the InternationalMonetary Fund with Art 144(1) of the Constitution. On the interpretation of Art 144(1), therewas no prima facie case of reasonable suspicion that such incompatibility existed. Moreover,the applicant did not have sufficient interest in the matter.
Asian Studies | Public Law and Legal Theory
Singapore Law Watch Commentary
Singapore Academy of Law
ONG, Benjamin Joshua.
Public law theory and judicial review in Singapore: Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v AG  SGCA 56. (2013). Singapore Law Watch Commentary. 1-6. Research Collection School Of Law.
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2451
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.