Weak Law v. strong ties: An empirical study of business investment, law and political connections in China
Based on a large-scale survey of Chinese entrepreneurs, our study explores how legal and political institutions influence investment decisions made by private companies. The study finds that, consistent with the conventional view, a more effective legal system is correlated with short-term general investment, and that the judiciary is important mainly because of its restraint over the state. The role of effective courts, however, diminishes when private entrepreneurs consider making long-term investment. We find a positive association between the entrepreneurs' political backgrounds and their R&D investment, suggesting that Chinese courts, in spite of decades of reform, are not yet viewed as reliable to protect long-term private investment from expropriation, policy instability, and a hostile regulatory environment. Rather, informal political connections constitute the premise for the protection of long-term investment. We also find evidence indicating that political ties are expensive resources to accumulate and maintain, so Chinese entrepreneurs tap into them only when substantial long-term interests are at stake. The findings contribute to the literature on law and economic development.
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics | Transnational Law
Law of Transnational Business
Review of Law and Economics
ZHANG, Wei and LI, Ji.
Weak Law v. strong ties: An empirical study of business investment, law and political connections in China. (2017). Review of Law and Economics. 13, (1),. Research Collection School Of Law.
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2286
This document is currently not available here.