The Functions of Criminal Law in Riot Control
Publication Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
1-1986
Abstract
Determining the points at which group behavior moves from legitimate activity into an unruly mob and finally into a criminal riot is difficult. In addition, labeling behavior as a 'riot' can influence the course of events. Police intervention may extend and intensify a riot. Crowd behavior and decisions regarding police responses to it reflect political and social factors. Use of the criminal justice process to control collective behavior has a long history. However, crowd control often now represents the institutionalization of confrontation between police and the working class use of public space for recreational and political purposes. The use of the criminal justice process to deal with riots is problematic because the fact criminalization focuses on individual behavior, whereas a riot represents collective behavior. Policing a riot involves crowd control, but the result of this policing is the identification of individual offenses and offenders. Thus, using the police and courts to deal with collective behavior involves basic contradictions and is often inappropriate.
Discipline
Criminal Law | Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance
Publication
Power, regulation and resistance: Studies in the sociology of law
Editor
R. Tomasic & R. Lucas
First Page
137
Last Page
150
ISBN
9780858892903
Publisher
Canberra College of Advanced Education
City or Country
Canberra
Citation
FINDLAY, Mark and FINDLAY, Mark.
The Functions of Criminal Law in Riot Control. (1986). Power, regulation and resistance: Studies in the sociology of law. 137-150.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2076
Additional URL
http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780858892903
Comments
{50% contribution}