Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
3-2012
Abstract
This piece discusses the following aspects of contractual interpretation in Singapore raised in the recent Singapore High Court case of Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd [2011] 4 SLR 1094: (a) the distinction between interpretation and implication of terms in fact; (b) the occasions in which extrinsic evidence is admissible for the interpretation of contracts in Singapore; and (c) the distinction between “admissible extrinsic evidence” and “permissible interpretation”.
Discipline
Asian Studies | Commercial Law
Publication
Singapore Academy of Law Journal
Volume
24
Issue
1
First Page
275
Last Page
297
ISSN
0218-2009
Publisher
Singapore Academy of Law
Citation
GOH, Yihan.
Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd. (2012). Singapore Academy of Law Journal. 24, (1), 275-297.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1404