Misrepresentation, Fiduciary Duty and Negligence: Investor Scores Rare Win in Deutsche Bank v Chang

Author

Kee Yang LOW, Singapore Management UniversityFollow

Publication Type

Case note/Digest

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

4-2013

Abstract

Law reports of the last decade are littered with unsuccessful suits by investors against their banks for negligent or unsuitable advice. Rarely do investors succeed. This is despite the wide array of courses of action available, allowing them to sue for breaches by the bank of contractual duty (in particular, through misrepresentation), duty of care, statutory duty and fiduciary duty.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Banking and Finance Law | Public Law and Legal Theory

Research Areas

Corporate, Finance and Securities Law

Publication

Singapore Law Gazette

Issue

Apr

ISSN

1019-942X

Publisher

Singapore Academy of Law

Citation

LOW, Kee Yang. Misrepresentation, Fiduciary Duty and Negligence: Investor Scores Rare Win in Deutsche Bank v Chang. (2013). Singapore Law Gazette. .
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1345

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Additional URL

https://v1.lawgazette.com.sg/2013-04/724.htm