Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
3-2012
Abstract
This paper analyses the critical influences on witness-based truth-telling for judicial decision-making in the international criminal tribunals. The judicial fixation on witness testimony reflects the weight and legitimacy given to personal testimony before international courts. This weight must be balanced by the awareness that a witness may provide false testimony intentionally, or may be coaxed by third parties to provide such testimony, as has been evidenced recently before the ICC. If witness testimony is tainted then its capacity to endorse the truth-finding function of the court is compromised. As a consequence the ability to assert that the tribunal is a ‘moral court’ based on empirical truth in such circumstances is jeopardized. The nexus between witness testimony, truth, the morality of judicial determinations, and the legitimacy this affords is explored in what follows. We question whether simple assertions that witness testimony, tested through adversarial examination, produces truth and resultant morality, are all they seem. The analysis also critiques the forensic reality of witness testimony before the international tribunals. Ultimately the paper suggests that while truthful testimony is crucial if international criminal trials are to produce legitimate judicial determinations, the naïve claim to a moral court as a consequence of tested witness testimony is problematic at least and unsustainable at best.
Keywords
International Criminal Court, truth, legitimacy, witness testimony, judicial discretion, selective prosecution, moral court
Discipline
Comparative and Foreign Law | Criminal Law | Human Rights Law
Publication
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Volume
1
Issue
1
First Page
73
Last Page
101
ISSN
2211-9051
Identifier
10.1163/2211906X-00101003
Publisher
Martinus Nijhoff
Citation
FINDLAY, Mark and Ngane, Sylvia.
Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War. (2012). Global Journal of Comparative Law. 1, (1), 73-101.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1166
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
http://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00101003