Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
12-2012
Abstract
This paper examines the impact that the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-border Insolvency has had on States in the light of the central problems often associated with transnational insolvencies. Despite the accolades that it has received, the Model Law has been adopted in only 19 countries in the last 15 years and that too in many different ways. If the number of adoptees and the rather conditional acceptance of the Model Law’s provisions represent a lack of international enthusiasm for adopting the Model Law, what are the reasons for this? The paper concludes by asking whether the UNCITRAL Model Law presently has a future in dealing with cross-border insolvencies.
Discipline
Bankruptcy Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | International Law
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
International Insolvency Review
Volume
21
Issue
3
First Page
199
Last Page
223
ISSN
1099-1107
Identifier
10.1002/iir.1203
Publisher
Wiley
Citation
MOHAN, S. Chandra.
Cross-border Insolvency Problems: Is the UNCITRAL Model Law the Answer?. (2012). International Insolvency Review. 21, (3), 199-223.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1145
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1203
Included in
Bankruptcy Law Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, International Law Commons