Rethinking Unjust Enrichment, Bailment and Necessity
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2011
Abstract
The Kos In The Winson , 1 the House of Lords held that salvors who took steps to prevent deterioration of salved cargo after a salvage agreement had ended had “a correlative right to charge the owner of the goods with the expenses reasonably incurred in doing so”. The * Pupil Barrister, Hong Kong. ** Lecturer in Law, Taylor’s University, Malaysia The authors would like to thank Professor Lusina Ho of HKU and Mr David Martin-Clark for their helpful comments and encouragements. All views and errors remain our own. 1. China Pacific SA v. Food Corp of India (The Winson) [1982] AC 939, 961 (Lord Diplock). See also ibid , 963 (Lord Simon of Glaisdale). CASE AND COMMENT 179
Discipline
Commercial Law
Publication
Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
Volume
2011
First Page
178 - 184
ISSN
0306-2945
Citation
LEE, Ken TC and SEE, Alvin Wei-Liang.
Rethinking Unjust Enrichment, Bailment and Necessity. (2011). Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. 2011, 178 - 184.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1115