Economic Torts

Publication Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

It has, on occasion, been suggested that Lumley v Gye should be understood as a particular manifestation of the more general principle that one commits a tort if he knowingly and intentionally procures an actionable wrong. Indeed, some support for this view can be found in English decisions that imposed liability for procuring the breach of statutory duty and for inducing the breach of an equitable duty. On the other hand, the suggestion that there is a tort of “procuring a breach of trust” has been firmly resisted because the rules on third-party and accessory liability are already well established in the law of trusts. On balance, therefore, the authorities do not yet support the proposition that a general tort of “procuring an actionable wrong” exists. Indeed, it is submitted that a sweeping extension of the principle in Lumley v Gye has little to commend itself. Given that each civil wrong is unique in the rights or interests it protects, the creation or extension of accessory liability in each context should be determined by close reference to the nature of the protected interests, as well as the policy concerns particular to that context.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Torts

Research Areas

Corporate, Finance and Securities Law

Publication

The Law of Torts in Singapore

Editor

Gary Chan and Lee Pey Woan

First Page

573

Last Page

612

ISBN

9789810886905

Publisher

Academy Publishing

City or Country

Singapore

Comments

Gary Chan

Additional URL

https://worldcat.org/isbn/9789810886905

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS