Publication Type
Case note/Digest
Publication Date
11-2011
Abstract
Coherency in international litigation and upholding exclusive jurisdiction clauses, for the most part, work hand in hand. Courts generally take jurisdiction on very wide and exorbitant grounds. There is therefore the ever-present risk of irreconcilable judgments stemming from multiple courts hearing disputes arising from the same transaction or state of affairs. One way in which such a risk is averted is by giving effect to exclusive jurisdiction clauses where parties have included such clauses into their contracts. Thus, when faced with an action brought in breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of another forum, the starting position is that the court will stay its proceedings unless the plaintiff is able to show “strong cause” or “strong reasons” why he should be allowed to breach his promise to sue exclusively in another forum. Another means by which the courts strive to uphold exclusive jurisdiction clauses is by taking a liberal construction of them.
Discipline
Commercial Law
Publication
Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
Volume
2011
Issue
4
First Page
470
Last Page
477
ISSN
0306-2945
Publisher
Informa
Citation
CHONG, Adeline.
The "Party Scope" of exclusive jurisdiction clauses: Global Partners Fund Ltd v Babcock & Brown Ltd. (2011). Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. 2011, (4), 470-477.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1062
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
http://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=276730