Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

9-2017

Abstract

We examine how alumni ties with corporate boards differentially affect male and female analysts’ job performance and career outcomes. Connection improves men’s job performance — forecasting accuracy and recommendation impact — significantly more than women’s. Controlling for performance, connection further contributes to men’s, but not women’s, likelihood of being voted by institutional investors as “star” analysts, a marker of career success. These asymmetric effects are stronger in more opaque firms and among younger analysts, but is absent from a placebo test. Our evidence indicates that men reap higher benefits from social networks than women in both job performance and subjective evaluation.

Keywords

analyst research, gender, connections, social network

Discipline

Accounting | Corporate Finance | Gender and Sexuality | Portfolio and Security Analysis

Research Areas

Corporate Reporting and Disclosure

Publication

Review of Financial Studies

Volume

30

Issue

9

First Page

3305

Last Page

3335

ISSN

0893-9454

Identifier

10.1093/rfs/hhx040

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx040

Share

COinS