While prior studies have predominantly shown that CEO narcissism and hubris exhibit similar effects on various strategic decisions and outcomes, this study aims to explore the mechanisms underlying how narcissistic vs. hubristic CEOs affect their firms differently. Specifically, we investigate how peer influence moderates the CEO narcissism/hubris – CSR relationships. With a sample of S&P 1500 firms for 2003–2010, we find that the positive relationship between CEO narcissism and CSR is strengthened (weakened) when board-interlocked peer firms invest less (more) intensively in CSR than a CEO’s own firm; the negative relationship between CEO hubris and CSR is strengthened when peer firms are engaged in less CSR than a CEO’s own firm.
board-interlocked peer firms, CEO narcissism, CEO hubris, corporate social responsibility (CSR), S&P 1500, index firms
Strategic Management Policy
Strategy and Organisation
Strategic Management Journal
Wiley: 24 months
MACK, Daniel Z.; MACK, Daniel Z.; and CHEN, Guoli.
The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. (2018). Strategic Management Journal. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business.
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5602
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.