Although the evidence for the use of situational judgment tests (SJTs) in high-stakes testing has been generally promising, questions have been raised regarding the potential coachability of SJTs. This study reports the first examination of the effects of coaching on SJT scores in an operational high-stakes setting. We contrast findings from a simple comparison of SJT scores for coached and uncoached participants (posttest only) with three different approaches to deal with the effects of self-selection into coaching programs, namely using a pretest as a covariate and using two different forms of propensity score-based matching using a wide range of variables as covariates. Coaching effects were estimated at about 0.5 SDs. The implications for the use of SJTs in high-stakes settings and for coaching research in general are discussed.
Organizational Behavior and Theory | Social and Behavioral Sciences
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Wiley: 24 months
LIEVENS, Filip Rene O; BUYSE, T; SACKETT, PR; and CONNELLY, BS.
The effects of coaching on situational judgment tests in high-stakes selection. (2012). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 20, (3), 272-282. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business.
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5515
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.