Employing an experiment study (N = 256), this study examines how individuals ethical orientation (deontology vs. consequentialism) and CSR message frame (normative vs. strategic) influence corporate hypocrisy perception and negative communication intentions toward a given company. Findings demonstrate that deontological ethical orientation and strategic CSR frame induce stronger corporate hypocrisy perception and negative communication intention than do consequential ethical orientation and normative CSR frame. In addition, deontological ethical orientation moderated the effects of CSR frames on negative communication intention toward the company. Implications for both public relations scholarship and practices are discussed.
Corporate hypocrisy, Ethical orientation, Media frame, Normative CSR, Strategic CSR
Business and Corporate Communications | Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Public Relations Review
SHIM, KyuJin; CHUNG, Myojung; and KIM, Young.
Does ethical orientation matter? Determinants of public reaction to CSR communication. (2017). Public Relations Review. 43, (4), 817-828. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business.
Available at: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5298
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.