Publication Type

Master Thesis

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

5-2021

Abstract

This present study investigated the effect of outcome interdependence on different types of deceptions – mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, in a negotiation context. 150 SMU students were recruited to engage in a negotiation task and were randomly assigned to either a high outcome interdependence condition where the monetary reward was awarded based on the points scored by the dyad or a low outcome interdependence condition where the monetary reward was awarded based on the points scored by the individual. The results showed that in a self-rated scale, dyads in the low outcome interdependence condition rated themselves to have engaged in more mutually beneficial and self-interested deception compared to dyads in the high outcome interdependence condition. Similarly, when two blind raters were asked to code the chat for deception, they found that dyads in the low outcome interdependence engaged in more mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, though the former was not statistically significant. Further research is required to examine if outcome interdependence could potentially have a similar effect on other types of deception (e.g. emotional deception) or if the effects would hold across different mediums (e.g. face-to-face vs online).

Keywords

Deception, mutually beneficial deception, self-interested, outcome interdependence, negotiation

Degree Awarded

Master of Philosophy in Psychology

Discipline

Social Psychology | Social Psychology and Interaction

Supervisor(s)

TSAI, Ming-Hong

First Page

1

Last Page

55

Publisher

Singapore Management University

City or Country

Singapore

Download

Share

COinS